4.7 Article

Structure/Activity Analysis of TASK-3 Channel Antagonists Based on a 5,6,7,8 tetrahydropyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidine

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20092252

关键词

TASK-3 channel; 5; 6; 7; 8 tetrahydropyrido[4; 3-d]pyrimidine derivatives; PK-THPP; TASK channels blockers; mutagenesis screen; molecular docking; molecular dynamics; drug-protein interaction

资金

  1. Fondecyt [11180604, 1140624, 1191133]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DE1482-4/1]
  3. Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channels Associated Diseases (MiNICAD), that belongs to Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio, Ministry of Economy, Development and Tourism, Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TASK-3 potassium (K+) channels are highly expressed in the central nervous system, regulating the membrane potential of excitable cells. TASK-3 is involved in neurotransmitter action and has been identified as an oncogenic K+ channel. For this reason, the understanding of the action mechanism of pharmacological modulators of these channels is essential to obtain new therapeutic strategies. In this study we describe the binding mode of the potent antagonist PK-THPP into the TASK-3 channel. PK-THPP blocks TASK-1, the closest relative channel of TASK-3, with almost nine-times less potency. Our results confirm that the binding is influenced by the fenestrations state of TASK-3 channels and occurs when they are open. The binding is mainly governed by hydrophobic contacts between the blocker and the residues of the binding site. These interactions occur not only for PK-THPP, but also for the antagonist series based on 5,6,7,8 tetrahydropyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold (THPP series). However, the marked difference in the potency of THPP series compounds such as 20b, 21, 22 and 23 (PK-THPP) respect to compounds such as 17b, inhibiting TASK-3 channels in the micromolar range is due to the presence of a hydrogen bond acceptor group that can establish interactions with the threonines of the selectivity filter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据