4.7 Article

First principles study on hydrogen storage in yttrium doped graphyne: Role of acetylene linkage in enhancing hydrogen storage

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 31, 页码 16735-16744

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.051

关键词

Hydrogen storage; Graphyne; Density functional theory; Carbon nanomaterials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through Density Functional Theory Simulations we predict that a Ytrrium atom attached on graphyne surface can adsorb up to a maximum of 9 molecular hydrogens (H-2), with a uniform binding energy of similar to 0.3 eV/H-2 and an average desorption temperature of around 400 K (ideal for fuel cell applications), leading to 10 wt% of hydrogen, substantially higher than the requirement by DoE. The higher hydrogen wt% in Y doped graphyne compared to Y doped Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNT) and graphene is due to the presence of sp hybridized C atoms (in the acetylene linkage) supplying additional in-plane p(x)-p(y) orbitals leading to pi (pi*) bonding (antibonding) states. Charge transfer from metal to carbon nanostructure results in a redistribution of s, p, d orbitals of the metal leading to a non - spin polarized ground state in Y doped graphyne, due to the presence of the acetylene linkage, whereas Y doped SWNT and graphene remain magnetic like the isolated metal atom. In the non-magnetic graphyne + Y system, the net charge transfer from Y to successive H2 molecules is less than in magnetic Y + graphene and Y + SWNT systems, enabling Y + graphyne to store a larger number of H-2 molecules. Furthermore, our ab initio MD simulations show that the system is stable even at room temperature and there is no dissociation of H-2 molecules, enabling the system to achieve 100% desorption. So Y doped graphyne is found to be a promising hydrogen storage device with high wt%, 100% recyclability and desirable desorption temperature. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据