4.1 Article

Finding of remarkable synergistic effect on the aroxyl-radical-scavenging rates under the coexistence of α-tocopherol and catechins

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS
卷 51, 期 9, 页码 643-656

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21284

关键词

antioxidant activity; catechins; free radicals; reaction rate; stopped-flow spectrophotometry; vitamin E

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18K05518]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K05518] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of aroxyl radical (ArO center dot)-scavenging rate constants (ks AOH ) of antioxidants (AOHs) (alpha-tocopherol (alpha-TocH) and three catechins (CatHs) (ie, epicatechin (EC), epigallocatechin (EGC), and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)) were performed in ethanol solution, using stopped-flow spectrophotometry. ks AOH values were measured not only for each AOH, but also for the mixtures of two AOHs (alpha-TocH and CatH). A notable synergistic effect that the ks alpha- TocH value of alpha-TocH increases 1.29, 1.84, and 1.65 times under the coexistence of constant concentrations of EC, EGC, and EGCG, respectively, was observed for the solutions including alpha-TocH and CatH. Similarly, ks CatH values of CatHs (EC, EGC, and EGCG) increased 1.72, 2.25, and 2.34 times under the coexistence of constant concentrations of alpha-TocH, respectively. UV-Vis absorption of alpha-tocopheroxyl radical (alpha-Toc(center dot)) (lambda(max) = 428 nm), which had been produced by reaction of alpha-TocH with ArO center dot, decreased remarkably under the coexistence of alpha-TocH and CatHs due to the fast alpha-TocH-regeneration reaction by CatHs. The result suggests that the prooxidant reaction due to alpha-Toc(center dot) is suppressed by the coexistence of CatHs. By analyzing the formation and decay curves of alpha-Toc(center dot), it has been ascertained that one molecule of EGCG having three OH groups at B-ring may rapidly regenerate three molecules of alpha-Toc(center dot) to alpha-TocH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据