4.7 Article

Evaluation of structural, functional, and anti-oxidant potential of differentially extracted polysaccharides from potatoes peels

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.074

关键词

Potato peel; Polysaccharides; Differential extraction; Physicochemical; Anti-oxidant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31850410476]
  2. Major Projects of Science and Technology in Anhui Province [17030701028, 17030701058]
  3. Zhongyuan scholars in Henan Province [192101510004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potato peel was used for the extraction of three types of polysaccharides (PW, PAL, and PAC) using water, alkaline, and acid treatments, respectively. The structure of the PP polysaccharides was examined by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis and Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results suggest that the extracted polysaccharides constituted essentially three functional groups: C=O, C-H, and O-H. The polysaccharides were comprised of low proportions of proteins, 17-23% uronic acids, and approximately 70% carbohydrates. PAL, PW, and PAC with molecular weights of 2.25 x 10(3), 2.18 x 10(3), and 1.92 x 10(3) kDa, respectively, were composed of rhamnose, xylose, mannose, arabinose, glucose, and galactose. Functional properties (solubility, oil holding capacity, foaming, and emulsion properties) of these polysaccharides were evaluated. Among three, PAL showed the highest fat-binding capacity which was 7.50 g/g with the solubility of 95.06%. The three polysaccharides possessed appreciable in vitro anti-oxidant (scavenging DPPH and ABTS(+) radicals, chelating ferrous ions, and reducing power) potential. PAL exhibited the strongest reducing power, scavenging activity on DPPH radicals and chelating capability on ferrous ions. PP polysaccharides can be used as promising natural antioxidants in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic preparations. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据