4.0 Review

Vitamin E status in healthy population in Asia: A review of current literature

期刊

出版社

HOGREFE AG-HOGREFE AG SUISSE
DOI: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000590

关键词

vitamin E prevalence; healthy; vitamin E deficiency; tocopherol status; vitamin E status; Asia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin E deficiency is common in most Asian countries, including India, with lack of attention on both vitamin E intake and status in the past. There is currently no consensus on cut offs for defining deficiency and sufficiency of vitamin E. More research is needed to establish age, gender, and physiological state specific cut offs for vitamin E levels.
Vitamin E is a lipid soluble antioxidant which mainly circulates as alpha-tocopherol in the human plasma. Its deficiency is associated with ataxia, neuropathy, anaemia and several other health conditions. Although substantial data on vitamin E status has been published worldwide, there is paucity of data on the extent of deficiency from most Asian countries, including India. Part of the problem is lack of validated biomarkers for vitamin E and no consensus on cut offs for defining deficiency and sufficiency. Thus, interpretation of the data on the vitamin E status is difficult. Limited available data from 31 studies on vitamin E status in healthy people from Asia, the most populated continent, has been collated for the purpose of this review. Broadly, the results suggest inadequate vitamin E status in most age groups, with the prevalence of deficiency reaching 67%, 80%, 56% and 72% in infants, children and adolescents, adults, elderly and pregnant women, respectively, based on varying cut offs. The findings are not surprising as both, vitamin E intakes and its status have not received too much attention in the past. Lack of conclusive data accentuates the need for more research on the vitamin E status across all age groups and to define age, gender and physiological state specific cut offs for vitamin E levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据