4.7 Article

Multi-layer competitive-cooperative framework for performance enhancement of differential evolution

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 482, 期 -, 页码 86-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.12.065

关键词

Differential evolution (DE); Global numerical optimization; Multi-layer competitive-cooperative

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671485]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFR11050]
  3. City University of Hong Kong under a SRG Grant [7004710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differential evolution (DE) is recognized as one of the most powerful optimizers in the evolutionary algorithm (EA) family. Many DE variants were proposed in recent years, but significant differences in performances between them are hardly observed. Therefore, this paper suggests a multi-layer competitive-cooperative (MLCC) framework to facilitate the competition and cooperation of multiple DEs, which in turns, achieve a significant performance improvement. Unlike other multi-method strategies which adopt a multi-population based structure, with individuals only evolving in their corresponding subpopulations, MLCC implements a parallel structure with the entire population simultaneously monitored by multiple DEs assigned to their corresponding layers. An individual can store, utilize and update its evolution information in different layers based on an individual preference based layer selecting (IPLS) mechanism and a computational resource allocation bias (RAB) mechanism. In IPLS, individuals connect to only one favorite layer. While in RAB, high-quality solutions are evolved by considering all the layers. Thus DEs associated in the layers work in a competitive and cooperative manner. The proposed MLCC framework has been implemented on several highly competitive DEs. Experimental studies show that the MLCC variants significantly outperform the baseline DEs as well as several state-of-the-art and up-to-date DEs on CEC benchmark functions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据