4.7 Article

A model-free Bayesian classifier

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 482, 期 -, 页码 171-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.026

关键词

Bayesian theorem; Classifier; Unitive framework; Model-free; Nearest neighbor

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1601800]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Branch) [[2018]3002]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673046]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XK1802-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When using the naive Bayesian classifier (NBC), it is necessary to assume that the attributes are independent. Although the relationship between the attributes can be analyzed by the Bayesian network (BN), the network structure and parameters need to be trained. Meanwhile, each continuous attribute is given a priori probability distribution for both the NBC and the BN. If the actual probability distribution of the samples is inconsistent with the priori probability distribution, the classification result is poor. In this paper, a model-free Bayesian classifier (MFBC) is proposed to cope with the drawbacks of the NBC and the BN. The information of the sample space and the joint probability density can be obtained based on the nearest neighbor (NN) strategy. The proposed MFBC is able to cope with discrete or continuous attributes even if there is no a priori probability distribution of the attributes. It is also not necessary to build a network structure to obtain a unitive calculation framework for the attributes. Moreover, the probability distribution for limited amounts of samples is approximated using the NN method. Then, the classification label of a sample can be predicted by the MFBC. The sensitivity analysis of the MFBC is obtained using the UCI data sets. Compared with some classical and ensemble classifiers, the analysis results verify the effectiveness and convergence performance of the MFBC. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据