4.4 Article

Chlamydia muridarum Induces Pathology in the Female Upper Genital Tract via Distinct Mechanisms

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 87, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00145-19

关键词

CD4(+)/CD8(+) T cells; Chlamydia; hydrosalpinx

资金

  1. U.S. NIH [R01AI047997, R01AI121989]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexually transmitted infection with Chlamydia trachomatis may lead to fibrotic blockage in women's upper genital tracts, resulting in tubal infertility. Intravaginal inoculation with C. muridarum readily induces fibrotic blockage or hydrosalpinx in mice and is used for investigating C. trachomatis pathogenicity. Using this model in combination with an antibody depletion approach, we confirmed CD4(+) T cell-mediated protective immunity and a CD8(+) T cell-dependent pathogenic mechanism during chlamydial infection in C57BL/6J mice. However, when mice genetically deficient in CD8(+) T cells were evaluated, we found, surprisingly, that these mice were still able to develop robust hydrosalpinx following C. muridarum infection, both contradicting the observation made in C57BL/6J mice and suggesting a pathogenic mechanism that is independent of CD8(+) T cells. We further found that depletion of CD4(+) T cells from CD8(+) T cell-deficient mice significantly reduced chlamydial induction of hydrosalpinx, indicating that CD4(+) T cells became pathogenic in mice genetically deficient in CD8(+) T cells. Since depletion of CD4(+) T cells both promoted chlamydial infection and reduced chlamydial pathogenicity in CD8(+) T cell-deficient mice, we propose that in the absence of CD8(+) T cells, some CD4(+) T cells may remain protective (as in C57BL/6J mice), while others may directly contribute to chlamydial pathogenicity. Thus, chlamydial pathogenicity can be mediated by distinct host mechanisms, depending upon host genetics and infection conditions. The CD8(+) T cell-deficient mouse model may be useful for further investigating the mechanisms by which CD4(+ )T cells promote chlamydial pathogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据