4.4 Review

Fundus image quality assessment: survey, challenges, and future scope

期刊

IET IMAGE PROCESSING
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1211-1224

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.6212

关键词

learning (artificial intelligence); biomedical optical imaging; diseases; image segmentation; medical image processing; eye; photography; fundus image quality assessment; fundus photography; fundus image acquisition; fundus IQA algorithms

资金

  1. Visvesvaraya PhD scheme for Electronics and IT Research Fellowship (MeitY, India)
  2. Newton-Bhabha fund - Department of Biotechnology (DBT) India
  3. British Council UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various ocular diseases, such as cataract, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma have affected a large proportion of the population worldwide. In ophthalmology, fundus photography is used for the diagnosis of such retinal disorders. Nowadays, the set-up of fundus image acquisition has changed from a fixed position to portable devices, making acquisition more vulnerable to distortions. However, a trustworthy diagnosis solely relies upon the quality of the fundus image. In recent years, fundus image quality assessment (IQA) has drawn much attention from researchers. This study presents a detailed survey of the fundus IQA research. The survey covers a comprehensive discussion on the factors affecting the fundus image quality and the real-time distortions. The fundus IQA algorithms have been analysed on the basis of the methodologies used and divided into three classes, namely: (i) similarity-based, (ii) segmentation-based, and (iii) machine learning based. In addition, limitations of state of the art in this research field are also presented with the possible solutions. The objective of this study is to provide a detailed information about the fundus IQA research with its significance, present status, limitations, and future scope. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first survey paper on the fundus IQA research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据