4.7 Article

Utilizing Demand Response to Improve Network Reliability and Ageing Resilience

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 2216-2227

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2883612

关键词

Ageing; asset management; emergency ratings; demand response; flexibility; overhead lines; probabilistic thermal rating; sequential Monte Carlo; reliability; resilience

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N030028/1]
  2. British Council Netwon-Mosharafa Fund
  3. EPSRC [EP/N030028/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing operation flexibility and resilience at uncertainties is an everlasting challenge for existing power networks. Emergency loadings and probabilistic thermal ratings are traditionally deployed on overhead lines (OHLs) to provide network operators with such flexibility. The challenge is to quantify the impact of these operating practices on the OHL conductor ageing risks, but only a few investigations exist on potential solutions to enhance flexibility whilst minimizing ageing risks by employing demand response. This paper presents a probabilistic modeling approach that uses a two-objective optimization function to minimize network's OHLs ageing and maximize its reliability at uncertainties by utilizing the available demand response at emergencies. Hence, the proposed optimization provides the operator with the flexibility to tradeoff between ageing and reliability costs against demand response costs. A predefined expected equivalent network ageing index is formulated to relate component ageing with available network demand response. The study of the proposed framework on the 24-bus IEEE-RTS resulted in more than 30% reduction of the network's expected energy not supplied and interruption costs, whilst halving the overall network ageing. Demand response, thus, can have a significant impact on reducing ageing and maintenance costs at critical lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据