4.6 Article

Efficient X-Band Transmitter With Integrated GaN Power Amplifier and Supply Modulator

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2019.2898188

关键词

Envelope tracking (ET); gallium nitride (GaN); microwave monolithic integrated circuit (MMIC); power digital-to-analog converter (pDAC); supply modulation (SM)

资金

  1. National Instruments
  2. Office of Naval Research through the DARPA Microscale Power Conversion Program [N00014-11-1-0931]
  3. Johns Hopkins APL [142344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present a high-efficiency transmitter based on an integrated circuit (IC) supply modulator implemented in the same 0.15-mu m gallium nitride (GaN)-on-SiC RF process as the power amplifier (PA) monolithic microwave IC. The X-band 10-W two-stage PA is designed for stable operation with minimal drain capacitance, which enables fast supply modulation. The multilevel supply modulator provides eight voltage levels with 3-bit digital control [(power digital-to-analog converter (pDAC)], achieving a state-of-the-art slew rate of 5 kV/mu s. Characterization of the dynamic R-ON of the GaN switches allows the development of an efficiency model for the pDAC and an investigation of the effects of the pDAC internal resistance on the PA performance, resulting in a comprehensive efficiency model for the supply-modulated PA. The flexible compact transmitter consisting of the PA and pDAC ICs shows high efficiency in back-off for a variety of signals, both for radar and communications. Measured results for amplitude- and frequency-modulated radar pulses show a composite power-added efficiency (CPAE) of 44% with a peak power of 10 W at 9.57 GHz, with simultaneous spectral confinement and 52-dB improvement of the first time sidelobe. For a 20-MHz high peak-to-average ratio LTE signal, the CPAE increases from 11% to 32% compared to a fixed supply voltage transmitter, while linearity under dynamic supply operation is maintained through digital predistortion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据