4.6 Article

EM Design and Analysis of Frequency Selective Surface Based on Substrate-Integrated Waveguide Technology for Airborne Radome Application

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2019.2905196

关键词

Airborne; frequency selective surfaces (FSSs); radar cross section (RCS); radome; sandwich; substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW); transmission performance

资金

  1. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India [17-2/2014-TS.I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a bandpass frequency selective surface (FSS) based on substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) technology is presented for airborne radome application. The proposed FSS element consists of a tapered cross-slot on either side of the substrate surrounded by metallic vias. The structure selectively allows the impinging electromagnetic (EM) wave through it in the specified frequency band. The element shows very stable frequency response for oblique incidence and the sharp roll-off performance characteristics at the edges of operating region in the rejection band. The -10 dB relative bandwidth (BW) of the element is 12.8% from 9.5 to 10.8 GHz with a very good insertion loss (IL) of 0.1 dB. Furthermore, the spectacular advantages of the FSS element based on SIW have been used for modeling the airborne radome application. The proposed radome structure is operating at 10 GHz with a relative 10 dB BW of 25.0% (8.20-10.6 GHz) with maximum (IL) better than 0.1 dB in its passband. The behavior of the FSS radome has been analyzed at different conformal sectors and thickness is optimized tier optimal performance. The key parameters of radome such as transmission performance, radiation efficiency, and radar cross section (RCS) have been studied. Experimental verifications are carried out to prove the validity of the estimated results. The results show promising performance of the proposed FSS based on SIW technology for airborne radome application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据