4.7 Article

Knowledge-based Collaborative Deep Learning for Benign-Malignant Lung Nodule Classification on Chest CT

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 991-1004

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2876510

关键词

Lung nodule classification; deep learning; collaborative learning; computed tomography (CT)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771397, 61471297]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accurate identification of malignant lung nodules on chest CT is critical for the early detection of lung cancer, which also offers patients the best chance of cure. Deep learning methods have recently been successfully introduced to computer vision problems, although substantial challenges remain in the detection of malignant nodules due to the lack of large training data sets. In this paper, we propose a multi-view knowledge-based collaborative (MV-KBC) deep model to separate malignant from benign nodules using limited chest CT data. Our model learns 3-D lung nodule characteristics by decomposing a 3-D nodule into nine fixed views. For each view, we construct a knowledge-based collaborative (KBC) submodel, where three types of image patches are designed to fine-tune three pre-trainedResNet-50 networks that characterize the nodules' overall appearance, voxel, and shape heterogeneity, respectively. We jointly use the nine KBC submodels to classify lung nodules with an adaptive weighting scheme learned during the error back propagation, which enables the MV-KBC model to be trained in an end-to-end manner. The penalty loss function is used for better reduction of the false negative rate with a minimal effect on the overall performance of the MV-KBC model. We tested our method on the benchmark LIDC-IDRI data set and compared it to the five state-of-the-artclassificationapproaches. Our results show that the MV-KBC model achieved an accuracy of 91.60% for lung nodule classification with an AUC of 95.70%. These results are markedly superior to the state-of-the-art approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据