4.7 Article

Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 34-43

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw413

关键词

basket; trialbiomarker-based; trialmaster; protocolplatform; trialprecision; medicineumbrella trial

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CTSA] from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) [KL2 TR000136]
  2. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [R01 CA174779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, cancers once viewed as relatively homogeneous in terms of organ location and treatment strategy are now better understood to be increasingly heterogeneous across biomarker and genetically defined patient subgroups. This has produced a shift toward development of biomarker-targeted agents during a time when funding for cancer research has been limited; as a result, the need for improved operational efficiency in studying many agent-and-target combinations in parallel has emerged. Platform trials, basket trials, and umbrella trials are new approaches to clinical research driven by this need for enhanced efficiency in the modern era of increasingly specific cancer subpopulations and decreased resources to study treatments for individual cancer subtypes in a traditional way. In this review, we provide an overview of these new types of clinical trial designs, including discussions ofmotivation for their use, recommended terminology, examples, and challenges encountered in their application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据