4.7 Article

SWiBluX: Multi-Sensor Deep Learning Fingerprint for Precise Real-Time Indoor Tracking

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 3473-3486

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2892590

关键词

Indoor positioning; tracking; orientation; fingerprinting; particle filter; wireless; RSSI; IMU; feature vector; machine learning; deep learning; neural network

资金

  1. European Project: ICT4Life within the H2020 Research and Innovation Program [690090]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [690090] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indoor/outdoor localization topic has gained a significant research interest due to the wide range of potential applications. Commonly, the Fingerprinting methods for spatial characterization of the environments monitored are employed in deterministic/statistical estimation. However, there are Fingerprint parameters that are generally neglected and can seriously affect the performance yielding to low accurate location. Nowadays, machine and deep learning (DL) methods are employed in this topic due to its ability to approximate complex non-linear models being capable of mitigating the undesirable effects of wireless propagation. In this paper, a complete overview of most influential aspects in Fingerprinting and indoor tracking methods is presented. Furthermore, a novel multi-modal complete tracking system, called SWiBluX, based on statistic and DL techniques is presented. The system relies on relevant feature extraction from available data sources to estimate user's/target indoor position using a multi-phase statistical Fingerprint and DL disruptive approach. In addition, a Gaussian outlier filter is applied to the position estimation model output to further reduce the error in the estimation. The set of experiments performed shows that Fingerprint positioning accuracy estimation can be improved up to 45% resulting in a final estimation error that outperforms related literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据