4.6 Article

A 1-GHz 16-Element Four-Beam True-Time-Delay Digital Beamformer

期刊

IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 1304-1314

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSSC.2019.2894357

关键词

Delay line; digital beamforming; linear array; linearity; multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO); phased array; receiver; true-time-delay

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Arrays at Commercial Timescales (ACT)
  2. Samsung Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phased arrays are widely used due to their low power and small area usage. However, phased arrays depend on the narrowband assumption and, therefore, are not suitable for high-bandwidth applications. Emerging communication standards require increasingly higher bandwidths for improved data rates, which results in a need for timed arrays. However, high power consumption and large area requirements are drawbacks of radio frequency (RF) timed arrays. To resolve these issues, we introduce the first true-time-delay digital beamforming IC, which eliminates beam squinting error by adopting a baseband true-time-delay technique. Furthermore, we present a constant output impedance current-steering digital-to-analog converter (DAC), which improves the spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR) of a bandpass delta-sigma modulator by 7 dB. Due to the new DAC architecture, the 16-element beamformer improves SFDR by 13.7 dB from the array. Measured error vector magnitudes (EVMs) are better than 37 dB for 5-MBd quadratic-amplitude modulation (QAM)-64, QAM-256, and QAM-512. The prototype beamformer achieves nearly ideal beam patterns for both conventional and adaptive beamforming (i. e., adaptive nulling and tapering). The difference between normalized measured beam patterns and normalized simulated beam patterns is less than 1 dB within the 3-dB beamwidth. The beamformer, including 16 bandpass analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) occupies 0.29 mm2 and consumes 453 mW in total power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据