4.5 Article

Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 1557-1578

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23818

关键词

BRCA1; BRCA2; classification; clinical; multifactorial; quantitative; uncertain significance; variant

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [203477/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  2. AstraZeneca Funding Source: Medline
  3. Cancer Council NSW Funding Source: Medline
  4. Cancer Council South Australia Funding Source: Medline
  5. Cancer Council Tasmania Funding Source: Medline
  6. Cancer Council Victoria Funding Source: Medline
  7. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia Funding Source: Medline
  8. Cancer Research UK [C5047/A15007, C1281/A12014, C5047/A10692, C1287/A10118, C1287/A10710, C1287/A16563, C8197/A16565, C5047/A8384, C12292/A11174] Funding Source: Medline
  9. CIHR [PSR-SIIRI-701] Funding Source: Medline
  10. Deutsche Krebshilfe [(#110837, #70111850] Funding Source: Medline
  11. Dutch Cancer Society KWF [KWF/Pink Ribbon-11704, UL2012-5649] Funding Source: Medline
  12. EU H2020 [634935] Funding Source: Medline
  13. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR1282, URDCat, 2017SGR496, PERIS_MedPerCan] Funding Source: Medline
  14. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS PI16/01218, CIBERONC, FIS PI13/01711, FIS PI15/00355, PI16/00563] Funding Source: Medline
  15. Italian Association of Cancer Research [15547] Funding Source: Medline
  16. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) Funding Source: Medline
  17. National Health and Medical Research Council [ID1061778, ID1104808] Funding Source: Medline
  18. National Institute for Health Research [Manchester Biomedical Research centre (IS-BRC-1215] Funding Source: Medline
  19. National Institute of Health (USA) [CA192393, 1U19 CA148112, 1U19 CA148065-01, P50 CA1162091, 1U19 CA148537, CA116167, CA128978] Funding Source: Medline
  20. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA121245, R01 CA192393, U01 CA116167] Funding Source: Medline
  21. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [Grant 017.008.022] Funding Source: Medline
  22. Royal Society of New Zealand Funding Source: Medline
  23. Seventh Framework Programme [634935, 633784, 223175] Funding Source: Medline
  24. Wellcome Trust [203477/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Medline
  25. Queensland Cancer Fund Funding Source: Medline
  26. Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Funding Source: Medline
  27. Fondazione Pisa [Grant Clinical characterization of BRCA 1/2 Mis] Funding Source: Medline
  28. Breast Cancer Foundation of New Zealand Funding Source: Medline
  29. Newcastle University Funding Source: Medline
  30. Department of Defence, USA [W81XWH-10-1-0341] Funding Source: Medline
  31. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enferemdades Raras [ACCI 2016: ER17P1AC7112/2018] Funding Source: Medline
  32. Helsinki University Hospital Research fund Funding Source: Medline
  33. French National Institute of Cancer Funding Source: Medline
  34. Barretos Cancer Hospital [FINEP - CT-INFRA (02/2010)] Funding Source: Medline
  35. National Breast Cancer Foundation Funding Source: Medline
  36. Breast Cancer Research Foundation Funding Source: Medline
  37. Government of Galicia [Consolidation and structuring program: IN607B] Funding Source: Medline
  38. Leiden University Medical Centre [Grant 30.925] Funding Source: Medline
  39. Fundación Mutua Madrileña Funding Source: Medline
  40. Carlos III National Health Funding Source: Medline
  41. Scientific Foundation Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co-segregation, family cancer history profile, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case-control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1,395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; and 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared with information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known nonpathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene-specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据