4.2 Article

Pharmacokinetics of single dose radium-223 dichloride (BAY 88-8223) in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases

期刊

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 453-460

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-016-1093-8

关键词

Radium-223; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Metastases; Pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Bayer, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This open-label, non-randomized, phase I study examined the pharmacokinetics (PK) and radiation dosimetry of a single dose of radium-223 in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases. Six male Japanese patients (mean age 72.5 years, range 65-79 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV adenocarcinoma of the prostate were recruited. A single IV dose of radium-223 was delivered intravenously (IV) via slow bolus over a 2-5 min period: Cohort 1 received 50 kBq/kg and Cohort 2 received 100 kBq/kg. Following IV injection, radium-223 was rapidly eliminated from the blood in a multi-phasic manner. The fraction of the injected activity of radium-223 retained in the whole body 24 h following injection was 85 %. Biodistribution results showed initial bone uptake was 52 % (range 41-57 %). The maximum activity of radium-223 in the bone was observed within 2 h of dosing. Activity of radium-223 passed through the small intestine within 24 h. No activity was detected in other organs. The major radiation dose from radium-223 was found in osteogenic cells; calculated absorbed doses in osteogenic cells and in the red marrow were 0.76 Gy/MBq and 0.09 Gy/MBq, respectively. In Japanese patients with CRPC and bone metastases, radium-223 (IV) achieved maximum activity in the bone rapidly and passed through the intestine within 24 h, without signs of activity in other organs. The PK profile and absorbed radiation dose in organs and tissues in Japanese patients were similar to data from non-Japanese patients. Trial registration identification: NCT01565746.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据