4.4 Article

Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1758-1765

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.014

关键词

Bradycardia; Left bundle branch pacing; Pacemaker; Physiological pacing; Success rate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870260]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND In patients with or without left bundle branch block, left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can produce near normalization of QRS duration (QRSd). This has recently emerged as an alternative technique to His bundle pacing. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to characterize a novel approach for LBBP in patients with bradycardia indications for pacing and to assess implant success rate and midterm safety. METHODS Patients with bradycardia indications for pacing underwent LBBP by a trans-ventricular-septal method in the basal ventricular septum. Procedural success, pacing parameters, and complications were assessed at implantation and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS This prospective study evaluated 87 patients (sinus node dysfunction 67.8%; atrioventricular conduction disease 32.2%) undergoing pacemaker implantation. LBBP implantation succeeded in 80.5% (70/87) of patients and the remaining 17 patients received right ventricular septal pacing. The procedure time of LBBP implantation was 18.0 +/- 8.8 minutes with a fluoroscopic exposure time of 3.9 +/- 2.7 minutes. LBBP produced narrower electrocardiographic QRSd than did right ventricular septal pacing (113.2 +/- 9.9 ms vs 144.4 +/- 12.8 ms; P < .001). There were no major implantationrelated complications. The pacing threshold was low (0.76 +/- 0.22 V at implantation and 0.71 +/- 0.23 V at 3 months), with no loss of capture or lead dislodgment observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that in patients with standard bradycardia pacing indications, LBBP results in QRSd, 120 ms in most patients and can be performed successfully and safely in the majority of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据