4.4 Article

Facilitators and barriers to co-research by people with dementia and academic researchers: Findings from a qualitative study

期刊

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 761-771

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12891

关键词

barriers; co-research; dementia; facilitators; peer research; qualitative

资金

  1. ESRC [ES/L001802/2, ES/L001802/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Economic and Social Research Council/National Institute of Health [ES/L001802/1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Public and patient involvement (PPI) is now established in dementia research. Barriers and facilitators to engagement from family carers and people in early stages of dementia have been explored. However, specific barriers and facilitators to co-research with people with dementia have not previously been investigated. Objective To discover the facilitators of, and barriers to, involving people with dementia as co-researchers, from the perspectives of people with dementia, gatekeepers (family caregivers, ethics committee members, service providers) and researchers. Design Thematic analysis of data from individual interviews about the co-research experience. Results Four themes emerged from interviews with 19 participants (five people with dementia): getting one's head round it (assumptions about research and dementia; different forms of language); practicalities (eg transport; accessibility of communication); this feeling of safety (perceptions of danger, protectiveness and opportunities for building trust); and motivations (making a difference and keeping doing). Conclusions Findings both replicate and extend previous knowledge on PPI in dementia. Cognitive capacity of potential co-researchers with dementia is only a part of the picture, with attitudes and expectations of researchers, gatekeepers and people with dementia also forming barriers. Researcher education, adequate resourcing, and both creativity and flexibility are needed to support recruitment of co-researchers with dementia and to enable meaningful co-research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据