4.2 Article

Miscanthus xgiganteus biomass yield and quality in the Virginia Piedmont

期刊

GRASSLAND SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 233-240

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/grs.12237

关键词

bioenergy; biomass; leaf; stem ratios; miscanthus cultivars; tillers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Miscanthus xgiganteus holds promise for bioenergy production given its low input requirements and high aboveground biomass productivity. To date, research regarding M. xgiganteus management has focused largely on the fertilization and establishment requirements for successful crops, but limited information is available regarding cultivars suitability for different regions of the United States. Our objective was to evaluate the suitability of available cultivars under a limited input management regime in the Piedmont region of Virginia. Multi-year trials were conducted using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Biomass yields and morphological traits of three M. xgiganteus cultivars ('Freedom', 'Illinois' and 'Nagara') were tested, and structural components of feedstock quality calculated. In 2013, 'Nagara' was the greatest yielding cultivar, followed by 'Illinois', but no differences among cultivars were observed in the following 2 years. 'Nagara', a cultivar with the potential to maximize biomass and ethanol production (i.e., due to its high ash and low lignin contents) at the same time, would be a highly desirable cultivar from both a farmer and an industrial perspective. Water availability for establishment and harvesting phases was 30% to 56% above recommended levels for maximum growth rates (750 to 900 mm). With 30-year average precipitation around 1,150 mm, and soils not suited for annual row crops, the Piedmont region of Virginia has potential for M. xgiganteus high biomass production. Studies replicated at more locations and with the potential inclusion of other high-yielding M. xgiganteus cultivars are warranted to start building a specific body of knowledge about most suitable M. xgiganteus cultivars for the mid-Atlantic USA region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据