4.7 Article

High Contribution of Secondary Brown Carbon to Aerosol Light Absorption in the Southeastern Margin of Tibetan Plateau

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 46, 期 9, 页码 4962-4970

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019GL082731

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877391, 41661144020, 41877404]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optical properties of atmospheric secondary brown carbon (BrC) aerosol are poorly understood because of its chemical complexity, and this has hampered quantitative assessments of the impacts of this light-absorbing material on glaciers on the Tibetan Plateau. For this study, a statistical approach was developed to investigate BrC light absorption over the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Secondary sources for BrC were more important for absorption than primary ones. A diurnal cycle in secondary BrC absorption was explained by the formation of light-absorbing chromophores by photochemical oxidation after sunrise followed by photobleaching of the chromophores under the more oxidizing conditions as the day progressed. Multimethod analyses showed that biomass burning in northern Burma and along the Sino-Burmese border was the most important source for the secondary BrC. The mean integrated simple forcing efficiency was 79 W/g, indicating that secondary BrC can cause substantial radiative effects. Plain Language Summary A statistical approach was developed to evaluate light absorption by secondary brown carbon (BrC) aerosol particles. We characterized the diurnal cycle of secondary BrC over the southeastern margin of Tibetan Plateau, identified likely pollution sources, and estimated its radiative effects. To our knowledge, this is the first time that light absorption from primary versus secondary BrC has been evaluated. This approach should be useful for further improving models and accurately evaluating the effects of BrC on glacial recession on the Tibetan Plateau.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据