4.2 Article

Molecular and functional analysis of the insulin-like peptides gene in the oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense

期刊

GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 209-214

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.05.006

关键词

Growth and development; Mn-ILP; RNA interference; Macrobrachium nipponense

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [ZR2016CM12]
  2. project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J17KB112, J16LE59]
  3. Project of Shandong Peninsula Engineering Research Center of Comprehensive Brine Utilization [2018LS009, 2018LS015, 2018LS019]
  4. Doctoral Fund of Weifang University of Science and Technology [2017BS03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insulin-like peptide (ILP) family is a group of evolutionarily conserved proteins that control body size and organ growth in metazoans. In the current study we describe, for the first time, the Mn-ILP gene in the oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense. Full-length of the Mn-ILP cDNA was 1630 bp, encoding 174 amino acids. The deduced amino acid sequence of Mn-ILP had the typical features of ILP proteins, including two cleavage sites and six conserved cysteines. To define the function of Mn-ILP, the expression of the Mn-ILP gene in different growth stages of prawns of both sexes, in male prawns of different sizes, and in prawns at different stages of the molt cycle was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Mn-ILP expression was significantly higher 1) in the rapid growth stage than in the other stages of male prawns; 2) in the normal growth stage than in the gonad development stage of female prawns; 3) in big male prawns than in small male prawns; and 4) in the intermolt stage than in the other stages of the molt cycle in prawns of the same size. Further, silencing Mn-ILP expression by RNAi effectively slowed down the growth speed of M. nipponense. Thus, Mn-ILP appears to have an important role in the growth and development process of M. nipponense.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据