4.6 Article

Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulated hydrological impacts of land use change from temperate grassland to energy crops: A case study in western UK

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 1298-1317

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12628

关键词

bioenergy; evapotranspiration; flooding; hydrology; Miscanthus; short rotation coppice; streamflow

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M013200/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. Institute of Biology, Environment and Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University
  4. MAGLUE
  5. Energy Technologies Institute
  6. National Environment Research Council [NE/H01067X/1]
  7. BBSRC [BBS/E/W/0012843A] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. EPSRC [EP/S000771/1, EP/M013200/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When considering the large-scale deployment of bioenergy crops, it is important to understand the implication for ecosystem hydrological processes and the influences of crop type and location. Based on the potential for future land use change (LUC), the 10,280 km(2) West Wales Water Framework Directive River Basin District (UK) was selected as a typical grassland dominated district, and the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrology model with a geographic information systems interface was used to investigate implications for different bioenergy deployment scenarios. The study area was delineated into 855 sub-basins and 7,108 hydrological response units based on rivers, soil type, land use, and slope. Changes in hydrological components for two bioenergy crops (Miscanthus and short rotation coppice, SRC) planted on 50% (2,192 km(2)) or 25% (1,096 km(2)) of existing improved pasture are quantified. Across the study area as a whole, only surface run-off with SRC planted at the 50% level was significantly impacted, where it was reduced by up to 23% (during April). However, results varied spatially and a comparison of annual means for each sub-basin and scenario revealed surface run-off was significantly decreased and baseflow significantly increased (by a maximum of 40%) with both Miscanthus and SRC. Evapotranspiration was significantly increased with SRC (at both planting levels) and water yield was significantly reduced with SRC (at the 50% level) by up to 5%. Effects on streamflow were limited, varying between -5% and +5% change (compared to baseline) in the majority of sub-basins. The results suggest that for mesic temperate grasslands, adverse effects from the drying of soil and alterations to streamflow may not arise, and with surface run-off reduced and baseflow increased, there could, depending on crop location, be potential benefits for flood and erosion mitigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据