4.7 Review

Enhancing global change experiments through integration of remote-sensing techniques

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 215-224

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2031

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [0955771]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Earth & Space Science Fellowship [NNX16AO13H]
  3. NSF [1655095]
  4. NASA's Terrestrial Ecology Program [NNX14AJ14G]
  5. NSF MSB grant [1702379]
  6. RUBISCO SFA - Regional & Global Climate Modeling Program of the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) in the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Science
  7. NSF EF grant [1550657]
  8. Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiment (NGEE Arctic)
  9. DOE [DE-SC0012704]
  10. US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  11. Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiment (NGEE Tropics)
  12. BER DOE's Office of Science
  13. NASA [681572, NNX16AO13H, NNX14AJ14G, 898877] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global change experiments are often spatially and temporally limited because they are time- and labor-intensive, and expensive to carry out. We describe how the incorporation of remote-sensing techniques into global change experiments can complement traditional methods and provide additional information about system processes. We describe five emerging near-surface remote-sensing techniques: spectroscopy, thermal and fluorescence imaging, terrestrial laser scanning, digital repeat photography, and unmanned aerial systems. The addition of such techniques can reduce cost and effort, provide novel information, and expand existing observations by improving their context, accuracy, and completeness. In addition, we contend that use of airborne and satellite remote-sensing data during site selection can improve the ecological representativeness of future experiments. We conclude by recommending a high level of communication and collaboration between remote-sensing scientists and ecologists at all stages of global change experimentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据