4.7 Review

Lipidomic biomarkers and mechanisms of lipotoxicity in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 293-309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.029

关键词

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Lipotoxicity; Lipidomics; Lipid peroxidation; Oxidant stress; Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Erythrocyte membrane fatty acids; Vitamin E; Arachidonic acid; DHA; Eicosanoids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the most common form of chronic liver disease worldwide (about 25% of the general population) and 3-5% of patients develop non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), characterized by hepatocytes damage, inflammation and fibrosis, which increase the risk of developing liver failure, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The pathogenesis of NAFLD, particularly the mechanisms whereby a minority of patients develop a more severe phenotype, is still incompletely understood. In this review we examine the available literature on initial mechanisms of hepatocellular damage and inflammation, deriving from toxic effects of excess lipids. Accumulating data indicate that the total amount of triglycerides stored in the liver cells is not the main determinant of lipotoxicity and that specific lipid classes act as damaging agents. These lipotoxic species affect the cell behavior via multiple mechanisms, including activation of death receptors, endoplasmic reticulum stress, modification of mitochondrial function and oxidative stress. The gut microbiota, which provides signals through the intestine to the liver, is also reported to play a key role in lipotoxicity. Finally, we summarize the most recent lipidomic strategies utilized to explore the liver lipidome and its modifications in the course of NALFD. These include measures of lipid profiles in blood plasma and erythrocyte membranes that can surrogate to some extent lipid investigation in the liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据