4.7 Article

Novel composite films from regenerated cellulose-glycerol-polyvinyl alcohol: Mechanical and barrier properties

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 481-491

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.012

关键词

Regenerated cellulose; Tensile strength; Water vapor permeability; Anti-plasticizer; DSC; UV protection

资金

  1. Conselleria de Cultura, Educacion e Ordenacion Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia [ED431B 2016/009]
  2. CONACYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose is considered as an alternative for the demand of biocompatible and environmentally friendly food packaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate a composite film from regenerated cellulose combined with polyvinyl alcohol. Glycerol was used as a plasticizer. Mathematical models were used to describe the effect of the film structure on the mechanical (tensile strength, percentage of elongation at break) and barrier properties (water vapour permeability, light-barrier properties and transparency). The morphology, structural and thermal properties were evaluated by spectral analysis (FT-IR and UV-VIS-NIR), scanning electron microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Models predict cellulose-glycerol-polyvinyl alcohol films with tensile strength values from 25.9 to 369 MPa, similar to that of synthetic polymer films. The elongation at break of the developed films (0.89-18.7%) was lower than that of synthetic polymer films. The water vapour permeability obtained (2.32.10(-11)- 3.01.10(-11)g/s.m.Pa) was higher than that of petrochemical-based plastics. Cellulose films re- inforced with polyvinyl alcohol showed a smooth surface. Results showed that it is viable to accomplish composite films from cellulose-polyvinyl alcohol-glycerol with enhanced mechanical properties. The obtained films showed top values of transparency. The addition of glycerol resulted in films with a UV protective effect which could be important in food packaging to prevent lipid oxidative deterioration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据