4.7 Article

Effects of ultrasound treatment on the physicochemical and emulsifying properties of proteins from scallops (Chlamys farreri)

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 707-714

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.032

关键词

Scallops; Protein; Ultrasound treatment; Physicochemical properties; Emulsifying property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [31771926, 31730069]
  2. State Key Research and Development Plan Modern Food Processing and Food Storage and Transportation Technology and Equipment, China [2017YFD0400201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, different ultrasound powers, namely, 0, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 950 W with intensities of 0, 707.71, 1415.43, 2123.14, 2830.86 and 3361.64 W cm(-2), respectively, were applied to treat proteins from scallops. Proteins from scallops (C. farreri) (ScP) were obtained by alkali dissolution and acid deposition. Changes in the particle size, surface hydrophobicity, sulfhydryl group content, and emulsifying properties were investigated. With the increasing ultrasonic power, ScP has better disposability. Compared with other treatments, ScP treated by a 950 W ultrasound had smaller particles, a higher surface hydrophobicity index (H-0) (476.73 +/- 3.52), a higher free SH group (2.19 +/- 0.05 mu mol/g protein) and a higher nitrogen solubility index (NSI) (93.96 +/- 0.52%). SDS-PAGE showed that the ultrasound could not change the molecular weight distribution of ScP. Secondary structural analysis by circular dichroism indicated that a high power ultrasound treatment could decrease the random coil and alpha-helix constituents and increase the beta-sheet constituent of ScP. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) showed that the emulsion stability was increased by the ultrasound treatment. It was concluded that the ultrasound treatment has beneficial effects with respect to the physiochemical and emulsifying properties of ScP and promotes its potential industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据