4.7 Article

Antimicrobial activity of PIT-fabricated cinnamon oil nanoemulsions: Effect of surfactant concentration on morphology of foodborne pathogens

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 405-411

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.11.024

关键词

Phase inversion temperature; Cinnamon oil nanoemulsions; Foodborne pathogen; Dynamic time kill; Bacteria morphology

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund under The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHD/0163/2557]
  2. 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund) [GCUGR1125593036D-31-1]
  3. Special Task Force for Activating Research from Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University [STF 6200523003-1]
  4. Research Assistantship Funding from Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University [RAF_2561_017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of surfactant concentration (10 to 20 wt%) on the antimicrobial activity of cinnamon oil nanoemulsions formed by the phase inversion temperature (PIT) method was studied against a number of foodbome pathogens: Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), dynamic time kill, and changes in bacteria morphology were determined. Increasing non-ionic surfactant (Tween.80) concentration from 10 to 20 wt% increased the MIC values of the nanoemulsions. However, dynamic time kill plots revealed that nanoemulsions with higher surfactant concentrations (15 and 20 wt%) led to faster or more prolonged inhibition of bacteria compared to those with lower concentration (10 wt%) or with bulk cinnamon oil. Morphological changes of the bacteria were more promoted for nanoemulsions containing higher surfactant concentrations as shown by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). The antimicrobial activity of the cinnamon oil nanoemulsions was attributed to their ability to disrupt bacterial cell wall structures and promote expulsion of internal cellular material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据