4.7 Article

Laparoscopic Lavage for Perforated Diverticulitis With Purulent Peritonitis

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 164, 期 3, 页码 137-U115

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/M15-1210

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  2. Swedish Research Council [2012-1770]
  3. Health and Medical Care Committee of Regional Executive Board and Region Vastra Gotaland
  4. Adlerbertska Research Foundation
  5. Alice Swenzons Foundation
  6. Anna-Lisa and Bror Bjornsson Foundation
  7. Swedish Society of Medicine
  8. Faith Regen Foundation
  9. Goteborg Medical Society
  10. Sahlgrenska University Hospital Health Technology Assessment Center
  11. Johan & Jacob Soderberg Foundation
  12. Bengt Ihre Foundation
  13. Wilhelm & Martina Lundgren Foundation
  14. Magnus Bergvall Foundation
  15. Ruth and Richard Julin Foundation
  16. Signe and Olof Wallenius Foundation
  17. Adlerbertska Foundation
  18. Mary von Sydow Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis has traditionally been treated with open colon resection and stoma formation with risk for reoperations, morbidity, and mortality. Laparoscopic lavage alone has been suggested as definitive treatment. Objective: To compare laparoscopic lavage with open colon resection and colostomy (Hartmann procedure) for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. Design: Randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label trial. (ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN82208287) Setting: 9 hospitals in Sweden and Denmark. Patients: Patients who have confirmed Hinchey grade III perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis at diagnostic laparoscopy. Intervention: Randomization between laparoscopic lavage and the Hartmann procedure. Measurements: Primary outcome was the percentage of patients having 1 or more reoperations within 12 months. Key secondary outcomes were number of reoperations, hospital read-missions, total length of hospital stay during 12 months, and adverse events. Results: A total of 43 and 40 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic lavage and the Hartmann procedure with a me-dian (first, third quartiles) follow-up of 372 days (336, 394) and 378 days (226, 396), respectively. Fewer patients in the laparoscopic group (12 of 43; 27.9%) than in the Hartmann group (25 of 40; 62.5%) had at least 1 reoperation within 12 months (relative risk reduction, 59%; relative risk, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.72]; P = 0.004). Mortality and severe adverse events did not differ between groups. Total length of hospital stay (days) within 12 months was shorter for the laparoscopic group than the Hartmann group, with a reduction of 35% (relative risk, 0.65 [CI, 0.45 to 0.94]; P = 0.047). After 12 months, 3 patients in the laparoscopic group and 11 in the Hartmann group had a stoma. Limitation: Not all patients presenting with suspected diverticulitis were enrolled. Conclusion: Laparoscopic lavage reduced the need for reoperations, had a similar safety profile to the Hartmann procedure, and may be an appropriate treatment of choice for acute perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据