4.7 Review

Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Outcomes at 6 Months or Later in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgical Procedures A Systematic Review

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 165, 期 9, 页码 650-+

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/M16-0652

关键词

-

资金

  1. Paul B. Beeson Clinical Scientist Development Award in Aging from the National Institute on Aging [K08AG051187]
  2. American Federation for Aging Research
  3. John A. Hartford Foundation
  4. Atlantic Philanthropies
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [T32-HL007374]
  6. National Institute on Aging [R01AG025037, R01AG041785, P01AG03172, R01AG030618, R01AG051658, K24AG035075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Frailty assessment may inform surgical risk and prognosis not captured by conventional surgical risk scores. Purpose: To evaluate the evidence for various frailty instruments used to predict mortality, functional status, or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in older adults undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. Data Sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE (without language restrictions), from their inception to 2 May 2016. Study Selection: Cohort studies evaluating the association between frailty and mortality or functional status at 6 months or later in patients aged 60 years or older undergoing major or minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures. Data Extraction: 2 reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: Mobility, disability, and nutrition were frequently assessed domains of frailty in both types of procedures. In patients undergoing major procedures (n = 18 388; 8 studies), 9 frailty instruments were evaluated. There was moderate-quality evidence to assess mobility or disability and very-low- to low-quality evidence for using a multicomponent instrument to predict mortality or MACCEs. No studies examined functional status. In patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures (n = 5177; 17 studies), 13 frailty instruments were evaluated. There was moderate-to high-quality evidence for assessing mobility to predict mortality or functional status. Several multicomponent instruments predicted mortality, functional status, or MACCEs, but the quality of evidence was low to moderate. Multicomponent instruments that measure different frailty domains seemed to outperform single-component ones. Limitation: Heterogeneity of frailty assessment, limited generalizability of multicomponent frailty instruments, few validated frailty instruments, and potential publication bias. Conclusion: Frailty status, assessed by mobility, disability, and nutritional status, may predict mortality at 6 months or later after major cardiac surgical procedures and functional decline after minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据