4.7 Article

Impact of elagolix treatment on fatigue experienced by women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 112, 期 2, 页码 298-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.031

关键词

Endometriosis; fatigue; elagolix; gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist

资金

  1. Abbvie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist, for the reduction of fatigue in women with moderate or severe endometriosis-associated pain. Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Setting: Clinics. Patient(s): A total of 860 women treated with elagolix or placebo. Intervention(s): Women received either elagolix at 150 mg daily (QD) orally, elagolix at 200 mg twice daily (BID) orally, or placebo. Main Outcome Measure(s): Change from baseline to month 1, 3, and 6 visits, in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 6a questionnaire T-scores. Results(s): At baseline, 54%-74% of women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis reported having fatigue-related issues quite a bit'' or very much,'' depending on the question asked. Fatigue extent was reduced to 29%-43% and 14%-29% for women treated with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively, at 6 months, compared with 35%-50% with placebo. The resultant decrease in fatigue T-scores was significant after elagolix treatment compared with placebo at 6 months, with changes of -2.21 and -5.90 with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively. Significant reduction in fatigue scores were observed among patients reporting clinically meaningful response reduction'' in dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyspareunia (-7.31, -6.62, and -4.31, respectively) compared with nonresponders. Conclusion(s): In women with moderate to severe endometriosis related pain, elagolix significantly reduces fatigue levels. ((C) 2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据