4.7 Article

An improved algorithm for partial clustering

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 282-291

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.027

关键词

Clustering; Estimation of the number of clusters; Outlier detection

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) [776473, 776456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expert and intelligent systems use a variety of machine learning techniques to obtain and understand the information inherent in the data. Clustering is one of these techniques, which has become important and popular since it allows classifying an unlabeled dataset into clusters of similar objects. There are many clustering algorithms that have been proposed in the literature. From these algorithms, the Cross-Clustering algorithm is one of the most recent clustering algorithms for partial clustering (clustering where not necessarily all the objects are grouped into clusters), which has provided good results allowing estimating a suitable set of clusters, as well as eliminating outliers. However, this algorithm tends to eliminate too many objects as outliers, which leads to discard a lot of non-outlier objects. Additionally, the Cross-Clustering algorithms spends a lot of time evaluating several combinations of clusterings, trying to determine a suitable number of clusters. To overcome these problems, in this paper, an improved version of the Cross-Clustering algorithm (ICC) is proposed. ICC changes the clustering algorithm used for detecting outliers, as well as it modifies the way outliers are detected. Moreover, a stop criterion allowing to make a fast decision on the estimation of a suitable number of cluster, is also introduced. The performance of the improved Cross-Clustering algorithm is compared with the original algorithm on artificial and real datasets. Our results show that ICC improves the original algorithm and other state of the art clustering algorithms; in both, runtime and clustering quality. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据