4.6 Article

High density is a property of slow-cycling and treatment-resistant human glioblastoma cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 378, 期 1, 页码 76-86

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.03.003

关键词

Cancer; Glioma; Glioblastoma; Slow-cycling; Stem cell; Tumor

资金

  1. NIH/NINDS [U54CA163155, R21NS088114, 1R01 NS081117]
  2. American Brain Tumor Association Collaboration - Humor to Fight the Tumor
  3. Loglio Collaborative
  4. TDC Foundation
  5. Guggenhime Endowment Fund
  6. Vetenskapsrfidet (the Swedish Research Council)
  7. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  8. Foundation BLANCEFLOR Boncompagni Ludovisi
  9. ABTA Basic Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Slow-cycling and treatment-resistant cancer cells escape therapy, providing a rationale for regrowth and recurrence in patients. Much interest has focused on identifying the properties of slow-cycling tumor cells in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and lethal primary brain tumor. Despite aggressive ionizing radiation (IR) and treatment with the alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ), GBM patients invariably relapse and ultimately succumb to the disease. In patient biopsies, we demonstrated that GBM cells expressing the proliferation markers Ki67 and MCM2 displayed a larger cell volume compared to rare slow-cycling tumor cells. In optimized density gradients, we isolated a minor fraction of slow-cycling GBM cells in patient biopsies and tumorsphere cultures. Transcriptional profiling, self-renewal, and tumorigenicity assays reflected the slow-cycling state of high-density GBM cells (HDGCs) compared to the tumor bulk of low-density GBM cells (LDGCs). Slow-cycling HDGCs enriched for stem cell antigens proliferated a few days after isolation to generate LDGCs. Both in vitro and in vivo, we demonstrated that HDGCs show increased treatment-resistance to IR and TMZ treatment compared to LDGCs. In conclusion, density gradients represent a non-marker based approach to isolate slow cycling and treatment-resistant GBM cells across GBM subgroups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据