4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The influence of hydroxyapatite content on properties of poly(L-lactide)/hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds obtained using thermal induced phase separation technique

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 313-320

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.073

关键词

Poly(L-lactide); Hydroxyapatite; Thermal induced phase separation; Scaffolds; Cell proliferation

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Higher Education for Department of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Science Technology [0401/0125/18]
  2. Polish National Research Center [2015/19/B/ST5/01330]
  3. Toyota Technological Institute (Nagoya, Japan)
  4. Matsumae International Foundation (Tokyo, Japan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the research we obtained porous scaffolds based on poly(L-lactide) and synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) using thermal induced phase separation technique (TIPS) supported by salt leaching process (SL). The obtained series of composite foams differ in hydroxyapatite content (10, 25, 50, 75, 90 wt% of the HA in PLLA/HA systems). The investigated scaffolds porosity ranged from 88 to 98%, density from 0.024 to 0.140 g/cm(3). Water contact angle measurements indicated more hydrophilic scaffold surface with increasing hydroxyapatite content in the composites. Thermogravimetric analysis revealed higher thermal stability of all composites comparing to neat PLLA, indicated presence of similar to 3 wt% residual sodium chloride in the scaffolds. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis showed nucleation effect of hydroxyapatite and higher crystallinity of PLLA in the composites as compared to the neat PLLA. The above tests were supplemented with compressive strength measurements, which showed an increase in the Young's modulus and compressive stresses values parallelly with the increase of the filler content. Proliferation tests of MC3T3-E1 mouse calvaria pre-osteoblast cells indicated directly proportional relationship between hydroxyapatite content and cells proliferation rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据