4.5 Article

Spirituality among parents of children with cancer in a Middle Eastern country

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 21-27

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.009

关键词

Adaptation; Psychological; Cancer; Caregivers; Children; Hermeneutics; Lebanon; Palliative care; Qualitative study; Spirituality

资金

  1. American University of Beirut Faculty of Medicine Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Family caregivers of children with cancer face emotional, psychological, and spiritual challenges coping with their child's illness. For ensuring comprehensive multidisciplinary pediatric care, there is a need to understand and define what spirituality means for them in relation to their child's illness. The purpose of this study is to understand the meaning of spirituality for parents of cancer patients in Lebanon. Methods: This qualitative study followed the Heideggerian interpretive phenomenological method. Through purposeful sampling, 11 parents (mother or father) of children with cancer receiving treatment at a tertiary care center in Beirut, Lebanon were interviewed. Data were analyzed following the hermeneutical process as described by Diekelmann and Ironside (1998). Results: A constitutive pattern and overarching theme, spirituality is a two-level relationship. It is a relation with God and with people. It is the act of receiving and giving back and five major themes emerged from the data. These were Being there for me; Connectedness with other parents is a blessing and a torment; The power of knowing; Communication with Unknown and Spirituality is not religiosity. Conclusion: Lebanese parents of children with cancer defined the elements of their own spirituality. Relational aspects dominated and communication was an important factor. Implications for practice: This is the first study in the Middle East to address the meaning of spirituality in this population, and would pave the way for a customized palliative care program and integrative approach to patient care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据