4.5 Article

N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor open-channel blockers memantine and magnesium modulate nociceptive trigeminovascular neurotransmission in rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 2847-2859

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14423

关键词

glutamate; headache; microiontophoresis; migraine; naratriptan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental and clinical studies suggest that the low-affinity N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor open-channel blockers Mg2+ and memantine are effective in reducing trigeminal nociceptive activation. The aim of this study was to investigate the apparent effectiveness of these channel blockers using a model of trigeminal activation in vivo. Rats were anaesthetized before electrically stimulating the dura mater adjacent the middle meningeal artery. Neurons responding to stimulation were recorded extracellularly using electrophysiological methods. l-Glutamate or NMDA, and Mg2+, memantine, or sodium controls were applied locally using microiontophoresis. Microiontophoretic application of Mg2+ or memantine into the trigeminocervical complex inhibited mechanically and electrically stimulated craniovascular afferents, and l-glutamate or NMDA-evoked neuronal activity at the second-order trigeminal synapse of craniovascular afferents. By contrast, intravenous administration of MgSO4 (100 mg/kg) or memantine (10 mg/kg) did not significantly affect electrically stimulated afferent-evoked activity within the trigeminocervical complex. The Mg2+ and memantine concentrations achieved after systemic administration may not effectively inhibit activation of the trigeminocervical complex, perhaps providing an explanation for the relatively poor efficacy of these NMDA receptor open-channel blockers for headache treatment in clinical studies. Nevertheless, the present results suggest blocking of NMDA-receptor open channels inhibits nociceptive activation of the trigeminocervical complex. Further exploration of such channel blockers as a therapeutic strategy for primary head pain is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据