4.1 Article

Possible sensor applications of selected DNA-surfactant complexes

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-019-01367-2

关键词

Deoxyribonucleic acids; Biopolymers; Imidazoles; Ionic liquids; Ion-exchange reactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although much research has been performed on DNA complexes carrying long alkyl chains (C10, C16, and C18), there is no information about physicochemical characterization of synthesized composites with allyl imidazole-based ionic liquids and quaternary ammonium salts with n-butyl chains. Here, complexes were synthesized by ion-exchange reactions between sonicated DNA and three ionic liquids (ILs) formed from two imidazole-based compounds, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (Amim) or 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (Bmim), and from the quaternary ammonium salt tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (TBAB). Signals in UV-Vis, IR, and CD spectra indicating inclusion of small molecules into the DNA structure confirmed the formation of DNA complexes. Both IR and CD spectra indicated that the B-form conformation of the DNA did not change after the formation of the complexes. Similarly, X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that the formation of IL-DNA complexes did not change the structure of native B-form DNA. Molecular weight (M-w) and radii of gyration (R-g) values of IL-DNA complex chains, established by high-performance size exclusion chromatography coupled with multiangle-laser light-scattering with a differential refractive index detector, were significantly lower than those values found for native DNA molecules due to DNA fragmentation by sonication during complex formation and the direct effects of the IL on the DNA. Scanning electron microscopy images indicate the formation of nanofibres in DNA-Amim and DNA-Bmim complexes, whereas the formation of nanowires was found in samples of DNA-TBAB complexes. Changes in optical properties confirmed by UV and photoluminescence make DNA-IL complexes potential candidates for biosensor application. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据