4.7 Article

Long-term leaching and mechanical behaviour at recycled aggregate with different gypsum contents

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 35, 页码 35565-35573

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04925-5

关键词

Recycled aggregate; Long-term; mechanical behaviour; Dimensional changes; Sulphate content; Leaching tests; Environmental risk assessment; Sub-base road layer

资金

  1. European Regional Development's Fund (ERDF) of the European Union via the project Applications of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste (CDW) for the sustainable development of road infrastructure in central areas of Andalusiafrom th

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Construction and demolition recycling is regarded as an essential subject in the EU, as the target established by its policies to 2020 ratio is far from being achieved. The use of materials recycled fromsuchwaste has beenwidely deemed a contribution to the sustainability of the construction sector. Gypsum is one the limiting components of recycled aggregates used as a base layer in road construction. The aim of this research was to analyse the effect on mechanical properties, leaching behaviour and dimensional changes at long term in recycled aggregates with different gypsum contents. Load bearing capacity was conducted by California bearing ratio on prepared samples. Moreover, the compressive strength was conducted on samples prepared with a 3% cement addition. Both tests were studied long term. Dimensional changes were studied through swelling in California bearing ratio test mould under the modified Proctor conditions for 1 year and using an oedometer device for 5 months. Furthermore, environmental risk assessment was performed, classifying the material with gypsum addition as non-hazardous, given that sulphate anion was above the inert limit. Good mechanical behaviour in the long term and no significant dimensional changes were found regardless of gypsum content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据