4.8 Article

Enhanced Permanganate Oxidation of Sulfamethoxazole and Removal of Dissolved Organics with Biochar: Formation of Highly Oxidative Manganese Intermediate Species and in Situ Activation of Biochar

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 5282-5291

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00180

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0207203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51808163]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07201003-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic and was largely used in breeding industry. The reaction rate of SMX with KMnO4 is slow, and the adsorption efficiency of biochar for SMX was inferior (less than 11% in 30 min). By adding biochar powder into SMX solution with the addition of permanganate, the oxidation ratio of SMX surged to 97% in 30 min, and over 58% of the total organic carbon (TOC) was simultaneously removed. KMnO4 interacted with biochar and resulted in the formation of highly oxidative intermediate manganese species, which transformed SMX into hydrolysis products, oxygen-transfer products, and self-coupling products. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis showed that surface area, total pore volume, and micropore volume of biochar increased by 32.1%, 36.4%, and 80.6%, respectively, after reaction process. This in situ activation of biochar with KMnO4 enhanced its adsorption capacity and led to great improvement of TOC removal. Besides KMnO4 oxidation, biochar also enhanced TOC removal in Mn(III) oxidation (KMnO4+ bisulfite) and ozonization of SMX. Considering that KMnO4 could react with biochar and result in the formation of intermediate manganese species, while biochar can be simultaneously activated and exhibit high capacity for organic adsorption, the combination of biochar with the chemical/advanced oxidation could be a promising process for the removal of environmental pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据