4.7 Article

Occurrence of organophosphate flame retardants in farmland soils from Northern China: Primary source analysis and risk assessment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 832-838

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.036

关键词

Organophosphate flame retardants; Farmland soil; Source analysis; Risk assessment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 41773109, 41807356]
  2. 111 program, Ministry of Education of China [T2017002]
  3. the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Nankai University [63171108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ninety-eight soil samples were collected from farmland soils from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei core area, Northern China, where agricultural lands were subjected to contamination from intense urban and industrial activities. Twelve organophosphates flame retardants (OPFRs) were analyzed with total soil concentrations ranging from 0.543 mu g/kg to 54.9 mu g/kg. Chlorinated OPFRs were dominating at mean level of 3.64 mu g/kg and Tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate contributed the most (mean 3.36 +/- 5.61 mu g/kg, 98.0%). Tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate was fully detected at levels of 0.041-1.95 mu g/kg. Generally, tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate and triphenyl phosphate contributed the most to alkyl- (53.6%) and aryl-OPFRs (54.3%), respectively. The levels of Sigma(OPFRs) close to the core urban areas were significantly higher than those from background sites. The occurrence and fate of OPFRs in soil were significantly associated with total organic carbon content and mostly with fine soil particles (<0.005 mm), and a transfer potential from the atmosphere was predicted with logK(SA) values. Comparable soil levels with poly brominated diphenyl ethers s in other studies suggested that the contamination of OPFRs occurred in farmland soil with an increasing trend but currently showed no significant environmental risk based on risk quotient estimation (<1). This investigation warrants further study on behaviors of OPFRs in a soil system and a continual monitoring for their risk assessment. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据