4.7 Article

New trends in solar: A comparative study assessing the attitudes towards the adoption of rooftop PV

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 347-363

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.038

关键词

Building-applied photovoltaics (BAPV); Solar PV; PV adoption; Theory of Planned Behavior; Structural equation modeling

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-EE0006035]
  2. National Science Foundation [1541148]
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1541148] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The factors affecting the adoption of conventional solar PV have been broadly addressed in the recent literature. However, it is still to determine the public's acceptance of innovations of the traditional solar PV architecture. Building applied photovoltaic technology (BAPV) is a technological innovation that can be installed over existing building surfaces. This study compares an evaluation of the conscious and subconscious attitudinal, control and normative beliefs of American homeowners when randomly primed with two brochures depicting the purchasing, installation, and commissioning of solar PV systems, developed according to the characteristics of conventional and an adhesive plug and play BAPV system. The survey instrument (N = 400 survey participants) was designed in consonance to the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). When comparing the direct measures for each solar PV technology, no significant differences were found. This may indicate that for those unfamiliar with PV technology, placing an adhesive backing module on the roof is standard procedure and does not impact purchasing intentions. The evaluation further showed that unlike the subconscious control beliefs, social norms and attitudes have a significant impact on forming intentions to adopt solar PV. The implications of these findings for strategy, policy and future research are explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据