4.7 Article

Techno-economic assessment and optimization of a hybrid renewable co-supply of electricity, heat and hydrogen system to enhance performance by recovering excess electricity for a large energy consumer

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 131-141

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.067

关键词

Hybrid system; Thermal load controller; HRES; Cost optimization; Renewable energy; Hydrogen refueling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study attempts to optimize and examine the techno-economic feasibility of off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) to satisfy simultaneously electric, heat and hydrogen load of a large energy consumer. An innovative method is adopted so as to recover surplus electricity to generate heat and cut emissions. The system is comprised of solar panels, wind turbine, diesel generator, electrolyzer and boiler to supply 9910 kWh/day of electricity, 14 kg/day of hydrogen and thermal energy in five different major cities in Iran, namely Bandar Abbas, Shiraz, Tabriz, Tehran and Yazd. These figures are computed on average and the thermal load differs according to yearly weather temperature, which are 75, 22, 2000, 5200, 2200 and 1800 kWh/day respectively. To serve this purpose, HOMER Pro software was used and thermal load controller (TLC) (including electric boiler) was added to generate thermal energy by converting excess electricity of renewable energy production. Thus, a decrease in conventional fuel consumption, emissions and cost of energy (COE), as well as an increase in the renewable fraction of HRES without increasing project's size would be achievable. To meet peak demand and avoid intermittent behavior of HRES, a 1000 kW generator was picked up. Results indicate that recovering extra electricity can enhance renewable fraction by up to 35% and bring down COE and exhausted CO2 by 7.1% and 10.6% respectively, which highlight the necessity of TLC in HRES, chiefly in off-grid systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据