4.7 Article

Parametric analysis of torrefaction reactor operating under oxygen-lean conditions

期刊

ENERGY
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 603-614

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.194

关键词

Biomass; Torrefaction; Reactor design; Oxygen-lean; Energy densification

资金

  1. MIT Tata Center
  2. MIT Abdul Latif Jameel Water and Food Systems Lab (J-WAFS)
  3. MIT Tata Center Fellowship
  4. Cyclotron Road Fellowship
  5. Dolores Zohrab Liebmann Fellowship
  6. Robert and Switzer Foundation Fellowship
  7. Legatum Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A small-to medium-scale, mobile torrefaction system has the potential to improve the economics of biomass torrefaction and expand its deployment in decentralized, rural areas. In order to simplify the reactor design for deployment in these contexts, a torrefaction reactor prototype operating under oxygen-lean conditions was proposed and developed in our earlier study. The goal of this study is to carefully quantify some key performance metrics of the aforementioned oxygen-lean reactor design under more realistic conditions and compare these metrics with torrefaction under inert conditions. For each condition, we characterized the product yield, energy yield, and energy densification for different feedstock. By using mass closure and elemental analysis, we further calculated the composition in the solid and volatile components. We show some differences in the reactor's performance in comparison with existing literature data obtained under inert torrefaction conditions. In general, under an oxygen lean environment and at similar temperature and residence time, slightly over-torrefied products with reduced solid mass and energy yield were obtained, which is consistent with results reported in prior studies. These sacrifices in the reactor performance should be weighed against the benefits of a simplified design that has greater potential in remote areas. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据