4.7 Article

Model predictive energy management for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles considering optimal battery depth of discharge

期刊

ENERGY
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 667-678

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.074

关键词

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle; Energy management; Model predictive control; Battery aging; Pontryagin's minimum principle

资金

  1. EU [706253-pPHEV-H2020-MSCA-IF-2015]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [310822151026, 310822151121, 106112016CDJXZ338825, 106112017CDJQJ338811]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When developing an energy management strategy (EMS) including a battery aging model for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, the trade-off between the energy consumption cost (ECC) and the equivalent battery life loss cost (EBLLC) should be considered to minimize the total cost of both and improve the life cycle value. Unlike EMSs with a lower State of Charge (SOC) boundary value given in advance, this paper proposes a model predictive control of EMS based on an optimal battery depth of discharge (DOD) for a minimum sum of ECC and EBLLC. First, the optimal DOD is identified using Pontryagin's Minimum Principle and shooting method. Then a reference SOC is constructed with the optimal DOD, and a model predictive controller (MPC) in which the conflict between the ECC and EBLC is optimized in a moving horizon is implemented. The proposed EMS is examined by real-world driving cycles under different preview horizons, and the results indicate that MPCs with a battery aging model lower the total cost by 1.65%, 1.29% and 1.38%, respectively, for three preview horizons (5, 10 and 15 s) under a city bus route of about 70 km, compared to those unaware of battery aging. Meanwhile, global optimization algorithms like the dynamic programming and Pontryagin's Minimum Principle, as well as a rule-based method, are compared with the predictive controller, in terms of computational expense and accuracy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据