4.5 Article

Detection of Water Content in Transformer Oil Using Multi Frequency Ultrasonic with PCA-GA-BPNN

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12071379

关键词

transformer oil; multi frequency ultrasonic; water content; back propagation neural network; genetic algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51507144]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2019B021]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580771, 2016T90832]
  4. Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (CSTC) [cstc2016jcyjA0400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water content in oil is closely related to the deterioration performance of an insulation system, and accurate prediction of water content in oil is important for the stability and security level of power systems. A novel method of measuring water content in transformer oil using multi frequency ultrasonic with a back propagation neural network that was optimized by principal component analysis and genetic algorithm (PCA-GA-BPNN), is reported in this paper. 160 oil samples of different water content were investigated using the multi frequency ultrasonic detection technology. Then the multi frequency ultrasonic data were preprocessed using principal component analysis (PCA), which was implemented to obtain main principal components containing 95% of original information. After that, a genetic algorithm (GA) was incorporated to optimize the parameters for a back propagation neural network (BPNN), including the weight and threshold. Finally, the BPNN model with the optimized parameters was trained with a random 150 sets of pretreatment data, and the generalization ability of the model was tested with the remaining 10 sets. The mean squared error of the test sets was 8.65 x 10(-5), with a correlation coefficient of 0.98. Results show that the developed PCA-GA-BPNN model is robust and enables accurate prediction of a water content in transformer oil using multi frequency ultrasonic technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据