4.8 Article

Single-cell damage elicits regional, nematode-restricting ethylene responses in roots

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018100972

关键词

ethylene; nematodes; regional response; single-cell laser ablation; surface depolarization

资金

  1. ERC Consolidator Grant [616228-ENDOFUN]
  2. SNSF [CRSII3_136278, 31003A_156261]
  3. DFG [SI 1739/3-1]
  4. Federation of European Biochemical Sciences Long-Term Postdoctoral Fellowship
  5. EMBO Long-Term Postdoctoral Fellowship
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRSII3_136278, 31003A_156261] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants are exposed to cellular damage by mechanical stresses, herbivore feeding, or invading microbes. Primary wound responses are communicated to neighboring and distal tissues by mobile signals. In leaves, crushing of large cell populations activates a long-distance signal, causing jasmonate production in distal organs. This is mediated by a cation channel-mediated depolarization wave and is associated with cytosolic Ca2+ transient currents. Here, we report that much more restricted, single-cell wounding in roots by laser ablation elicits non-systemic, regional surface potential changes, calcium waves, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Surprisingly, laser ablation does not induce a robust jasmonate response, but regionally activates ethylene production and ethylene-response markers. This ethylene activation depends on calcium channel activities distinct from those in leaves, as well as a specific set of NADPH oxidases. Intriguingly, nematode attack elicits very similar responses, including membrane depolarization and regional upregulation of ethylene markers. Moreover, ethylene signaling antagonizes nematode feeding, delaying initial syncytial-phase establishment. Regional signals caused by single-cell wounding thus appear to constitute a relevant root immune response against small invaders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据