4.6 Article

Pore network modeling of liquid water and oxygen transport through the porosity-graded bilayer gas diffusion layer of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 264-276

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.115

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells; Pore network modeling; Micro-porous layer; Oxygen diffusion; Graded porosity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806067]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017MS018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), understanding the effect of graded porosity on liquid water distribution and oxygen diffusion inside the porous components is essential for the improvement of water management strategy. In this work, a regular three-dimensional pore network model is constructed to represent the bilayer gas diffusion layer (GDL) consisting of a porosity-graded micro-porous layer (GMPL) and a gas diffusion backing layer (GDBL). Based on this model, the liquid water distribution at breakthrough, relative oxygen effective diffusivity and limiting current density as a function of water saturation are obtained using invasion percolation algorithm and resistor-network theory, respectively. Parametric studies are also conducted to elucidate the effects of several structural factors, such as the graded porosity value of the GMPL, the GMPL thickness and the number of sub-layers in GMPL. The simulated results illustrate that the introduction of graded porosity can relieve the extent of the flooding phenomenon to a certain extent, and the underlying mechanism can be explained from the perspective of the pore scale. Furthermore, an optimum graded porosity value where the material has the preferred oxygen transfer capacity and high limit current density under partially saturated condition (water saturation is between 0.025 and 0.5) can be found. (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据