4.6 Article

Enhanced electrocatalytic CO formation from CO2 on nanostructured silver foam electrodes in ionic liquid/water mixtures

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 245-253

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.102

关键词

Ag foam; Carbon monoxide formation; CO2 conversion; Ionic liquid; Nanoneedles

资金

  1. CTI Swiss Competence Centre for Energy Research (SCCER Heat and Electricity Storage)
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [17-03-00602]
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Russian Federation of the Russian Federation
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [200020_172507]
  5. interfaculty Microscopy Imaging Centre (MIC) of the University of Bern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We employ a novel type of nanostructured silver foam electrocatalyst to the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([Bmim][BF4]) ionic liquid. The Ag catalyst is prepared from an aqueous electroplating bath by means of an additive-assisted electrodeposition approach, yielding macro-porous Ag foams. The pore sidewalls are composed of Ag nanoneedles having diameters of similar to 50-100 nm and lengths that can exceed 1 mm. We demonstrate that, when combined with the [Bmim][BF4] electrolyte, this Ag electrocatalyst significantly shifts the onset of CO2 electroreduction by similar to 220 mV to less negative potentials as compared to a polished Ag foil electrode. The addition of moderate amounts of water (optimum water mole fraction of 20%) to the pure [Bmim] [BF4] electrolyte leads to a further similar to 120 mV decrease in the CO2RR overpotential. The combination of the Ag foam catalyst with the [Bmim][BF4]/water mixture results in a similar to 300mV wide potential window where CO is selectively produced with Faraday efficiencies > 94%. The structural stability of the catalyst is supported by identical location scanning electron microscopy. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据