4.5 Article

Modelling fish communities in relation to water quality in the impounded lakes of China's South-to-North Water Diversion Project

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 397, 期 -, 页码 25-35

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.01.014

关键词

Ensemble modelling; Fish communities; Ecological impacts; Machine learning; South-to-North Water Diversion Project; Water quality changes

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31602158]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences) [QYZDB-SSW-SMC041]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Feature Institute Program) [Y55Z06]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Hundred Talent Program) [Y62302]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute Talent Program) [Y45Z04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large scale inter-basin water diversion projects would have a set of ecological and environmental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. However, knowledge regarding water transfer induced water quality changes in determining fish communities in the impounding ecosystems remain largely unknown. In the current study, we filled this research gap by using a set of machine learning algorithms to ensemble modelling fish community indices with water quality indicators in the impounded lakes along the eastern route of China's South-to-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP). Overall, our results realed that water quality changes can be good predictors for the variation of fish community structures in these lakes. Although different model techniques highlighted different variable importance of water quality in determining fish communities, there is generally a consensus that the hydrological related water quality indicators like: water clarity (e.g., total suspended solids) and nutrient loading (e.g., phosphate) contributed the most to the changes of fish communities. Our results also indicated that water diversions could bring knock-on effects on fish communities. Thus, more attention should be paid to long-term ecological effects from future water diversions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据